Addressing sub-station data security challenges

Operational data generated by sub-stations are vulnerable for interception by unauthorized actors and this presents a unique challenge to power companies. One the one hand, they have to balance operational constraints and on the other ensure adequate security to avoid any intrusion or data exfiltration.

In today’s blog post, we take a deep look at the problem, its various implications and suggest some remedial/mitigation measures that work.

Before you move forward, we would urge you to take a look at our previous blog post that covers specific IEC 62443-3-3 controls for OT operators in depth, here.

Now back to our post for the day.

Background

Various types of data are generated by sub stations during routine operations. This includes data on operations, communications and other non-operational data. This very data feeds into various operational aspects such as asset control, maintenance, operational and security monitoring and grid management. When this data is anonymized and secured, sub-stations reduce the risk of any form of unsolicited operational interference, asset or data manipulation or data exfiltration. Since this data is used both within the sub-station and beyond, such an interference may impact grid stability as well.

Key challenges in substation OT Security

Securing data related to OT environments in substations presents unique difficulties that are fundamentally different from all types of traditional IT security:

Prevalence of legacy systems  

• Vulnerability: Many substations use older, proprietary, or custom-built control systems and IEDs with extremely long operational lifecycles (often decades). These legacy systems were not designed with cybersecurity in mind.

• Impact: They often cannot be easily patched (or even monitored in some cases), do not respond to newer security controls, lack modern authentication mechanisms, and are sensitive to active security scanning, which can disrupt critical operations. Further, many such systems may not even be inventoried and their presence may slide under the radar. Any data leaks that may be happening through such legacy systems may not be detected.

Prioritization of availability over confidentiality

• OT's core mandate: In an OT environment, Availability (keeping the power on and systems running) and Integrity (ensuring control commands are correct) are paramount, even over Confidentiality. An ill-timed patch or a network security appliance failure could cause a system trip, leading to an outage.

• Conflict: Traditional IT security practices, which might prioritize frequent patching and high confidentiality, can conflict directly with OT's need for stability and safety. Lack of on-time patching may again open up these systems for data leaks not just at the asset level but even at the network level as well.

The IT/OT Convergence Risk

• The bridge: The integration of the corporate IT network (email, internet access) with the substation's OT network, often for remote access or data aggregation, creates a dangerous bridge.

• Threat: A common IT vector, like a phishing attack or malware injection in the corporate network, can now be the initial entry point for an attacker to pivot into the sensitive OT domain.

Specialized protocols and visibility gaps

• Unique language: OT systems communicate using specialized industrial protocols (like IEC 61850, DNP3, Modbus). Most conventional IT security tools (like firewalls and IDS) cannot "understand" or inspect the content of these protocols.

• Blind spots: This lack of deep packet inspection leads to visibility gaps, making it difficult to detect sophisticated attacks that misuse legitimate OT commands (e.g., the Industroyer malware).

Human factor and insufficient training

• Personnel risk: Insufficiently trained personnel, or the use of public/unsecured communication channels, can be a major entry point.

• Insider threat: Malicious or accidental actions by an employee or contractor with authorized physical/remote access can lead to unauthorized configuration changes, compromising the system's operational integrity.

What happens when OT assets or networks leak data in a substation?

The leaked data could provider hackers information on substation network. This includes protocols used, network configurations, asset use status, network traffic baseline and more. Using this data, threat actors can launch DDoS attacks or build and deploy custom malware. If sophisticated threat actors harvest network topology information, then they can carry out Man-in-the-middle attacks, fire high risk commands, disrupt communication and knock off assets causing grid instability.

Remediation and best practices for ensuring substation security

Securing an electrical substation requires a layered, defense-in-depth approach tailored specifically to the OT environment.

Robust Network Architecture and Segmentation

• Network Segmentation (Zoning): Implement strict segmentation of the OT network from the IT network using industrial firewalls. Create secure zones within the substation, isolating control systems (like IEDs and PLCs) from less critical systems.

• IDMZ (Industrial Demilitarized Zone): Use an IDMZ as a secure, buffered zone to manage data flow and remote access between the IT and OT networks, ensuring no direct communication path exists.

Comprehensive asset Inventory and monitoring

• Know Your Assets: Maintain a real-time, detailed inventory of every OT asset (IED, PLC, HMIs, network devices), including firmware versions, operating systems, and vulnerabilities. You can't secure what you don't know.

• Passive Monitoring: Deploy OT-aware Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) that use passive discovery techniques to monitor industrial network traffic. These tools can identify abnormal behaviors or unauthorized protocol commands without actively scanning or disrupting sensitive devices.

Identity, access, and configuration management

• Least Privilege: Implement Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) to ensure operators and maintenance staff only have the minimum access required for their specific tasks. Remove all default credentials.

• Secure Remote Access: All remote connections (e.g., for vendors or engineers) must use a Zero Trust architecture, be heavily controlled, use Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA), and be time-limited and logged.

• Configuration Control: Use version control and integrity checks on IED/relay configuration files. Unauthorized changes to protection settings are a common attack vector and must be instantly flagged.

Patching and compensating controls

• Disciplined patch Management: While full patching may not always be possible for legacy devices, a formal process must be in place. Test all patches thoroughly in a lab environment before deployment.

• Compensatory controls: For unpatchable or vulnerable legacy devices, or where the patch is delayed, deploy industrial firewalls in front of them to filter malicious traffic, or use data diodes to enforce one-way data flow, ensuring physical control commands cannot be sent back into the system.

Training and Incident Response

• Cyber-awareness: Conduct regular, OT-specific cybersecurity training for all personnel, including operators, engineers, and maintenance staff, focusing on physical security, phishing, and the dangers of removable media.

• Drill, document and respond: Develop a robust, practiced Incident Response Plan specifically for OT incidents. This plan must prioritize isolation and restoration of physical control systems over traditional data forensics.

Use of topology morphing

· Virtual node spoofing: Virtual nodes can be introduced to hide the real structure of the network.

· Decoy devices: Digital twins of crown jewels can be introduced to confuse hackers

· IP dynamism: Modifying node IP addresses frequently can secure systems by making it hard for hackers to latch on to assets   

· Decoy networks: Fake networks can be created to confuse hackers

· Change configurations whenever possible: Modifying system configurations makes it harder for hackers to understand network and asset dynamics

· Spoofing MAC: Modifying the MAC address often can confuse and disorient attackers.

· Fake data packets: Fake packets can make it harder for hackers to determine true network characteristics

· Traffic masking: Manipulating traffic patterns to change traffic characteristics to eliminate predictability

By adopting a hardened data security posture that aligns with the unique requirements of the electrical grid is an essential first step in ensuring power infrastructure security at the sub-station level. To keep the lights on, it is essential that the practices shared above are adopted by sub stations.

Shieldworkz can be your vendor partner to secure your Sub Station. Test drive our NDR solution.

Download our IEC 62443 checklist for secure OT operations

Go IEC 62443 compliant in 5 weeks with our Launchpad program

Find out the whole story behind the Asahi brewery cyberattack, here.